Blog post 3
The
web source I chose to review is called American Indians and the United States Constitution by Robert J Miller.
I think the perspective and viewpoint that Robert Miller conveys represents the
argument that Indigenous tribes have always had sovereignty, pre and post
contact. I enjoyed the way he laid out his argument, starting with Christopher
Columbus and moving through to the Native role in the constitution.
I have never examined the impact of
the Constitution on the Native population. I took an American history class in
college that studied in dept the impact on the African American population and
slavery but we did not touch on Native Americans. I’m just realizing now that
we probably should have. I think this web source was included in this course
because this isn’t a topic that is widely discussed, at least in my experience.
Like I said before Miller starts off
pointing out that native government's already existed when Christopher Columbus
sailed the ocean blue. These governments were fully operational political
bodies that had control of their citizens and their territories. They would be
an important factor in the development of the United States government. (1)
The European countries
that colonized North America dealt with the native tribal governments as
Sovereign nations. (1) They negotiated
with these sovereign nations “through official diplomatic means”, like official
government-to-government counsel sessions to create treaties. The United States
kept up these same practices after they took control. “The United States
negotiated signed and ratified almost 390 treaties with American Indian tribes.
Most of these treaties are still valid today.” (1) It is important to remember that
in these treaties the Native Americans were never given anything for free. In
fact, often times something was being taken away from them. “The United States
Supreme Court stated in 1905 that the United States and Indian treaties are not
a grant of rights to the Indians, but a grant of rights from them”.
After the
United States gained their freedom from England the exclusive power over Indian
Affairs would be placed in the hands of the national government instead of each
individual state. (1) “In July 1790, Congress passed a law which forbids States
and individuals from dealing with tribes and from buying Indian lands. This law
is still in effect today.”
In the
constitution of 1789, Article 1 and again in the 14th Amendment ratified in
1868 Native American individuals were addressed. The populations of each state
were counted to determine how many representatives a state could have in
Congress. Indians would not be counted unless they paid taxes. Indians were not
considered to be federal or state citizens unless they paid taxes. Even after
the Civil War when the 14th amendment was change to include all persons born or
naturalized in the United States it's still excluded individual Indians from
citizenship rights and excluded them from being counted towards congressional
representation unless they paid taxes. (1) This information demonstrates that
Congress still considered Indian governments to have Sovereignty in 1868. Most
Indians did not become United States citizens until 1924 when Congress passed a
law making all United States Indian citizens. (1) However, in many states Indians
were not allowed to vote in state elections because of confusion of whether
they belong to a certain state or had a more general citizenship to the United
States.
All this wonderful information from Robert Miller has contributed
to my views on the convoluted topic of sovereignty. After reading this web
source I understand that Native Americans have always been sovereign nations
and how difficult it has been to be independent.
American
Indians and the United States Constitution by Robert J Miller,
http://www.flashpointmag.com/amindus.htm
Indians are still dealing with voting issues in areas like North Dakota. Voters were worried about changes to voter identification requirements in the state. Many tribal member in the area believed they would be denied the right to vote because the law states you need a street address on your identification card which some Indians living on reservations do not have. They simply have a PO box because that is the only way mail is delivered in certain areas of the U.S. because it is so rural.
ReplyDeleteNow that the election is over the numbers are pouring in about how successful voter turn outs were in areas. In Sioux count which encompasses Standing Rock they had the highest turnout in at least 20 years more than doubling their 2014 turnout.
After the law was changed people became aware about them potentially being denied the right to vote. Seemingly they were granted the right and not many people had problems when election day passed which is good news.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/few-native-american-voters-had-id-issues-in-north-dakota/2018/11/07/96710462-e2ce-11e8-ba30-a7ded04d8fac_story.html?utm_term=.79bb0336cf36
This post really makes me think about how the federal government had to work to circumvent its own laws (or if it simply outright ignored them). If "Congress passed a law which forbids States and individuals from dealing with tribes and from buying Indian lands," then I'm rather curious as to how allotment took place. Did the government claim control of those lands in order to sell parcels to individuals? This is definitely a topic I'm interested in pursuing further. The brazenness of the federal government in breaking treaties in order to trample on the rights of native tribes was one of the themes of the education I received in school regarding Native Americans.
ReplyDelete